Category Archives: Dependency Injection

Scaling Silex applications

In my humble opinion Silex is great. It’s perfect to create prototypes, but when our application grows up it turns into a mess. That was what I thought until the last month, when I attended to a great talk about Silex with Javier Eguiluz. OK. Scaling Silex it’s not the same than with a Symfony application, but it’s possible.

It’s pretty straightforward to create a Silex application with composer:

{
    "require": {
        "silex/silex": "1.0.*"
    },
    "minimum-stability": "dev"
}

But there’s a better way. We can use the Fabien Potencier’s skeleton. With this skeleton we can organize our code better.

We also can use classes as controllers instead of using a closure with all the code. Igor Wiedler has a great post about this. You can read it here.

Today I’m playing with Silex and I want to show you something. Let’s start:

Probably you know that I’m a big fan of Symfony’s Dependency Injection Container (you can read about it here and here), but Silex uses Pimple. In fact the Silex application extends Pimple Class. My idea is the following one:

In the Igor’s post we can see how to use things like that:

$app->match('/video/{id}', 'Gonzalo123\ApiController::indexAction')->method('GET')->bind('video_info');

My idea is to store this information within a Service Container (we will use Symfony’s DIC). For example here we can see our routes.yml:

routes:
  video_info:
    pattern:  /video/{id}
    controller: Gonzalo123\ApiController::initAction
    requirements:
      _method:  GET

As we can see we need to implement one Extension for the alias “routes”. We only will implement the needed functions for YAML files in this example.

<?php

use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Extension\ExtensionInterface;
use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\ContainerBuilder;

class SilexRouteExtension implements ExtensionInterface
{
    /**
     * Loads a specific configuration.
     *
     * @param array            $config    An array of configuration values
     * @param ContainerBuilder $container A ContainerBuilder instance
     *
     * @throws InvalidArgumentException When provided tag is not defined in this extension
     *
     * @api
     */
    public function load(array $config, ContainerBuilder $container)
    {

    }

    /**
     * Returns the namespace to be used for this extension (XML namespace).
     *
     * @return string The XML namespace
     *
     * @api
     */
    public function getNamespace()
    {

    }

    /**
     * Returns the base path for the XSD files.
     *
     * @return string The XSD base path
     *
     * @api
     */
    public function getXsdValidationBasePath()
    {

    }

    /**
     * Returns the recommended alias to use in XML.
     *
     * This alias is also the mandatory prefix to use when using YAML.
     *
     * @return string The alias
     *
     * @api
     */
    public function getAlias()
    {
        return "routes";

    }
}

And now we only need to prepare the DIC. According to Fabien’s recommendation in his Silex skeleton, we only need to change the src/controllers.php

<?php

use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Response;
use Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Exception\NotFoundHttpException;
use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\ContainerBuilder;
use Symfony\Component\Config\FileLocator;
use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Loader\YamlFileLoader;

// Set up container
$container = new ContainerBuilder();
$container->registerExtension(new SilexRouteExtension);
$loader = new YamlFileLoader($container, new FileLocator(__DIR__ . '/../config/'));
// load configuration
$loader->load('routes.yml');
$app['container'] = $container;

$app->mount('/api', include 'controllers/myApp.php');

$container->compile();

$app->error(function (\Exception $e, $code) use ($app) {
    if ($app['debug']) {
        return;
    }

    $page = 404 == $code ? '404.html' : '500.html';

    return new Response($app['twig']->render($page, array('code' => $code)), $code);
});

and now we define the config/routes.yml

routes:
  video_info:
    pattern:  /video/{videoId}
    controller: Gonzalo123\ApiController::initAction
    requirements:
      _method:  GET

And finally the magic in our controllers/myApp.php:

<?php

$myApp = $app['controllers_factory'];

foreach ($container->getExtensionConfig('routes')[0] as $name => $route) {
    $controller = $myApp->match($route['pattern'], $route['controller']);
    $controller->method($route['requirements']['_method']);
    $controller->bind($name);
}
return $myApp;

The class for this example is: src/Gonzalo123/ApiController.php

<?php

namespace Gonzalo123;

use Silex\Application;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;

use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\JsonResponse;

class ApiController
{
    public function initAction(Request $request, Application $app)
    {
        return new JsonResponse(array(1, 1, $request->get('id')));
    }
}

As you can see the idea is to use classes as controllers, define them within the service container and build the silex needed code iterating over the configuration. What do you think?

How to configure Symfony’s Service Container to use Twitter API

Keeping on with the series about Symfony’s Services container (another posts here and here), now we will use the service container to use Twitter API from a service.

To use Twitter API we need to handle http requests. I’ve written several post about http request with PHP (example1, example2), but today we will use one amazing library to build clients: Guzzle. Guzzle is amazing. We can easily build a Twitter client with it. There’s one example is its landing page:

<?php
$client = new Client('https://api.twitter.com/{version}', array('version' => '1.1'));
$oauth  = new OauthPlugin(array(
    'consumer_key'    => '***',
    'consumer_secret' => '***',
    'token'           => '***',
    'token_secret'    => '***'
));
$client->addSubscriber($oauth);

echo $client->get('/statuses/user_timeline.json')->send()->getBody();

If we are working within a Symfony2 application or a PHP application that uses the Symfony’s Dependency injection container component you can easily integrate this simple script in the service container. I will show you the way that I use to do it. Let’s start:

The idea is simple. First we include guzzle within our composer.json and execute composer update:

    "require": {
        "guzzle/guzzle":"dev-master"
    }

Then we will create two files, one to store our Twitter credentials and another one to configure the service container:

# twitter.conf.yml
parameters:
  twitter.baseurl: https://api.twitter.com/1.1

  twitter.config:
    consumer_key: ***
    consumer_secret: ***
    token: ***
    token_secret: ***
# twitter.yml
parameters:
  class.guzzle.response: Guzzle\Http\Message\Response
  class.guzzle.client: Guzzle\Http\Client
  class.guzzle.oauthplugin: Guzzle\Plugin\Oauth\OauthPlugin

services:
  guzzle.twitter.client:
    class: %class.guzzle.client%
    arguments: [%twitter.baseurl%]
    calls:
      - [addSubscriber, [@guzzle.twitter.oauthplugin]]

  guzzle.twitter.oauthplugin:
    class: %class.guzzle.oauthplugin%
    arguments: [%twitter.config%]

And finally we include those files in our services.yml:

# services.yml
imports:
- { resource: twitter.conf.yml }
- { resource: twitter.yml }

And that’s all. Now we can use the service without problems:

<?php

namespace Gonzalo123\AppBundle\Controller;

use Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller\Controller;

class DefaultController extends Controller
{
    public function indexAction($name)
    {
        $twitterClient = $this->container->get('guzzle.twitter.client');
        $status = $twitterClient->get('statuses/user_timeline.json')
             ->send()->getBody();

        return $this->render('AppBundle:Default:index.html.twig', array(
            'status' => $status
        ));
    }
}

Dependency Injection Containers with PHP. When Pimple is not enough.

Two months ago I wrote an article about Dependency Injection with PHP and Pimple. After the post I was speaking about it with a group of colleagues and someone threw a question:

What happens if your container grows up? Does Pimple scale well?

The answer is not so easy. Pimple is really simple and good for small projects, but it becomes a little mess when we need to scale. Normally when I face a problem like that I like to checkout the Symfony2 code. It usually implements a good solution. There’s something I really like from Symfony2: it’s a brilliant component library and we can use those components within our projects instead of using the full stack framework. So why don’t we only use the Dependency Injection component from SF2 instead Pimple to solve the problem? Let’s start:

We are going to use composer to load our dependencies so we start writing our composer.json file. We want to use yaml files so we need to add “symfony/yaml” and “symfony/config” in addition to “symfony/dependency-injection”:

{
    "require": {
        "symfony/dependency-injection": "dev-master",
        "symfony/yaml": "dev-master",
        "symfony/config": "dev-master"
    },
    "autoload":{
        "psr-0":{
            "":"lib/"
        }
    },
}

Now we can run “composer install” command and we already have our vendors and our autolader properly set.

We are going to build exactly the same example than in the previous post:

<?php
class App
{
    private $proxy;

    public function __construct(Proxy $proxy)
    {
        echo "App::__construct\n";
        $this->proxy = $proxy;
    }

    public function hello()
    {
        return $this->proxy->hello();
    }
}

class Proxy
{
    private $curl;

    public function __construct(Curl $curl)
    {
        $this->curl = $curl;
    }

    public function hello()
    {
        echo "Proxy::__construct\n";
        return $this->curl->doGet();
    }
}

class Curl
{
    public function doGet()
    {
        echo "Curl::doGet\n";
        return "Hello";
    }
}

Now we create our file “services.yml” describing our dependency injection container behaviour:

services:
  app:
    class:     App
    arguments: [@Proxy]
  proxy:
    class:     Proxy
    arguments: [@Curl]
  curl:
    class:     Curl

and finally we can build the script:

<?php
include __DIR__ . "/vendor/autoload.php";

use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\ContainerBuilder;
use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Reference;
use Symfony\Component\Config\FileLocator;
use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Loader\YamlFileLoader;

$container = new ContainerBuilder();
$loader = new YamlFileLoader($container, new FileLocator(__DIR__));
$loader->load('services.yml');

$container->get('app')->hello();

IMHO is as simple a Pimple but much more flexible, customizable and it’s also well documented. For example we can split our yaml files into different ones and load them:

<?php
include __DIR__ . "/vendor/autoload.php";

use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\ContainerBuilder;
use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Reference;
use Symfony\Component\Config\FileLocator;
use Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Loader\YamlFileLoader;

$container = new ContainerBuilder();
$loader = new YamlFileLoader($container, new FileLocator(__DIR__));
$loader->load('services1.yml');
$loader->load('services2.yml');
$container->get('app')->hello();

An we also can use imports in our yaml files:

imports:
  - { resource: services2.yml }
services:
  app:
    class:     App
    arguments: [@Proxy]

If you don’t like yaml syntax and you prefer XML (I know. It looks insane :) ) you can use it, or even programatically with PHP.

What do you think?

Source code in github (see the README to install the vendors)

Building a simple Dependency Injection Container with PHP

If you are looking for a small Dependency Injection Container with PHP maybe you need have look to Pimple.

Pimple is a small Dependency Injection Container for PHP 5.3 that consists of just one file and one class (about 50 lines of code).

Now, keeping with my aim of reinvent the wheel, we will create a simple Dependency Injection Container basically to understand how does it work. Let’s start.

First of all: Do we really need a Dependency Injection Container (DIC)? If you are asking yourself this question, maybe you need to have look to Fabien Poetencier’s article.

We are going to work with a teorical problem like this:

Imagine we are going to build a service that uses one external REST API. We define your application with three classes:

  • App. The main application.
  • Proxy The part of the application that speaks with the external API
  • Curl. One curl wrapper to perform our http connections to the REST API

Our first approach can be:

<?php
class App
{
    private $proxy;

    public function __construct()
    {
        echo "App::__construct\n";
        $this->proxy = new Proxy();
    }

    public function hello()
    {
        return $this->proxy->hello();
    }
}

class Proxy
{
    private $curl;

    public function __construct()
    {
        $this->curl = new Curl();
    }

    public function hello()
    {
        echo "Proxy::__construct\n";
        return $this->curl->doGet();
    }
}

class Curl
{
    public function doGet()
    {
        echo "Curl::doGet\n";
        return "Hello";
    }
}

$app = new App();
echo $app->hello();

If we execute the script:

php example1.php 

App::__construct
Proxy::__construct
Curl::doGet
Hello

It works but we have one problem. Our application is strongly coupled. As we can see App creates a new instance of Proxy within the constructor and Proxy creates a new instance of Curl. That’s a problem especially if we want to use TDD. What happens if we want to mock Curl requests to test the application without using the real external service?. Dependency injection can help us here. We can change our application to:

<?php
class App
{
    private $proxy;

    public function __construct(Proxy $proxy)
    {
        echo "App::__construct\n";
        $this->proxy = $proxy;
    }

    public function hello()
    {
        return $this->proxy->hello();
    }
}

class Proxy
{
    private $curl;

    public function __construct(Curl $curl)
    {
        $this->curl = $curl;
    }

    public function hello()
    {
        echo "Proxy::__construct\n";
        return $this->curl->doGet();
    }
}

class Curl
{
    public function doGet()
    {
        echo "Curl::doGet\n";
        return "Hello";
    }
}


$app = new App(new Proxy(new Curl()));
echo $app->hello();

The outcome is exactly the same but now we can easily use mocks and use different configurations depending on the environment. Maybe your testing development does not have access to the real REST server.

Now our application isn’t coupled but as we can see our Dependency Injection becomes a mess. That’s one problem with DI. It’s pretty straightforward to inject simple things but when we have dependencies over a set of classes that’s becomes a difficult task. Because of that we can use Dependency Injection Containers.

If we choose Pimple as Dependency Injection Container we can refactor our application to:

<?php
class App
{
    private $proxy;

    public function __construct(Pimple $container)
    {
        echo "App::__construct\n";
        $this->proxy = $container['Proxy'];
    }

    public function hello()
    {
        return $this->proxy->hello();
    }
}

class Proxy
{
    private $curl;

    public function __construct(Pimple $container)
    {
        $this->curl = $container['Curl'];
    }

    public function hello()
    {
        echo "Proxy::__construct\n";
        return $this->curl->doGet();
    }
}

class Curl
{
    public function doGet()
    {
        echo "Curl::doGet\n";
        return "Hello";
    }
}

require_once 'Pimple.php';

$container = new Pimple();
$container['Curl'] = function ($c) {return new Curl();};
$container['Proxy'] = function ($c) {return new Proxy($c);};

$app = new App($container);
echo $app->hello();

But what is my problem with Pimple? Basically my problem is that my IDE cannot autocomplete correctly $container is an instance of Pimple not the “real” instance. OK It instantiated on demand the classes but it’s done at runtime and the IDE don’t know about that. We can solve it using an extra PHPDoc to give hints to the IDE but we also can use a different approach. Instead of using Pimple we can use this script:

<?php
class App
{
    private $proxy;

    public function __construct(Container $container)
    {
        echo "App::__construct\n";
        $this->proxy = $container->getProxy();
    }

    public function hello()
    {
        echo "App::hello\n";
        return $this->proxy->hello();
    }
}

class Proxy
{
    private $curl;

    public function __construct(Container $container)
    {
        echo "Proxy::__construct\n";
        $this->curl = $container->getCurl();
    }

    public function hello()
    {
        return $this->curl->doGet();
    }
}

class Curl
{
    public function doGet()
    {
        echo "Curl::doGet\n";
        return "Hello";
    }
}

class Container
{
    public function getProxy()
    {
        return new Proxy($this);
    }

    public function getCurl()
    {
        return new Curl();
    }
}

$app = new App(new Container());
echo $app->hello();

The idea is the same than Pimple but now we have created our custom Dependency Injection Container without extending any library and now our IDE will autocomplete the fucntion names without problems. If we want to share objects instead creating new ones each time we call the factory function of the container we can change a little bit our Container (the same way than Pimple::share) with a simple singleton pattern:

class Container
{
    static $proxy;
    public function shareProxy()
    {
        if (NULL === self::$proxy) self::$proxy = new Proxy($this);
        return self::$proxy;
    }

    public function getCurl()
    {
        return new Curl();
    }
}

And that’s all. What do you think?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 552 other followers