Category Archives: php

Building a Pimple/Container from a YAML file

The last May I attended to the great deSymfony day conference in Barcelona. At speaker’s dinner I had a great conversation with Máximo Cuadros about Dependency Injection Containers. We discuss about the customisation of containers. I said that I prefer Symfony´s DIC instead of Pimple, mainly because its configuration with YAML (or even xml) files. But In fact we can customise Pimple/Containers with YAML files in a similar way than we do it with Symfony’s DIC. In this example we’re going to see one way to do it.

We can easily extend the Pimple/Container and add a function to load a YAML files, parse them and build the container. But doing this we’re violating various SOLID principles. First we’re violating the Open-Close principle, because to extend our Pimple/Container with the new functionality we are adding new code within an existing class. We’re also violating the Dependency Inversion Principle and our new Pimple/Container is going to be harder to maintain. And finally we’re obviously violating the Single Responsibility Principle, because our new Pimple/Container is not only a DIC, it’s also a YAML parser.

There’s another way to perform this operation without upsetting SOLID principles. We can use the Symfony’s Config component

The idea is simple. Imagine this simple application:

use Pimple\Container;

$container = new Container();
$container['name'] = 'Gonzalo';

$container['Curl'] = function () {
    return new Curl();
};
$container['Proxy'] = function ($c) {
    return new Proxy($c['Curl']);
};

$container['App'] = function ($c) {
    return new App($c['Proxy'], $c['name']);
};

$app = $container['App'];
echo $app->hello();

We define the dependencies with code. But we want to define dependencies using a yml file for example:

parameters:
  name: Gonzalo

services:
  App:
    class:     App
    arguments: [@Proxy, %name%]
  Proxy:
    class:     Proxy
    arguments: [@Curl]
  Curl:
    class:     Curl

As we can see we’re using a similar syntax than Symfony’s DIC YAML files.
Now, with our new library we can use the following code:

use Pimple\Container;
use G\Yaml2Pimple\ContainerBuilder;
use G\Yaml2Pimple\YamlFileLoader;
use Symfony\Component\Config\FileLocator;

$container = new Container();

$builder = new ContainerBuilder($container);
$locator = new FileLocator(__DIR__);
$loader = new YamlFileLoader($builder, $locator);
$loader->load('services.yml');

$app = $container['App'];
echo $app->hello();

Now our Pimple/Container is just a Pimple/Container nothing more. It doesn’t know anything about yaml, parsers and thing like that. It’s doesn’t have any extra responsibility. The responsibility of the parser falls on YamlFileLoader
You can see the library in my github account. It’s but one usage example of Symfony’s Config component. It only allows Yaml files, but it can be extended with Xml files adding a XmlFileLoader.

Playing with websockets, angularjs and socket.io

I’m a big fan of websockets. I’ve got various post about them (here, here). Last months I’m working with angularjs projects and because of that I wanna play a little bit with websockets (with socket.io) and angularjs.

I want to build one angular service.

angular.module('io.service', []).
    factory('io', function ($http) {
        var socket,
            apiServer,
            ioEvent,
            watches = {};

        return {
            init: function (conf) {
                apiServer = conf.apiServer;
                ioEvent = conf.ioEvent;

                socket = io.connect(conf.ioServer);
                socket.on(ioEvent, function (data) {
                    return watches.hasOwnProperty(data.item) ? watches[data.item](data) : null;
                });
            },

            emit: function (arguments) {
                return $http.get(apiServer + '/request', {params: arguments});
            },

            watch: function (item, closure) {
                watches[item] = closure;
            },

            unWatch: function (item) {
                delete watches[item];
            }
        };
    });

And now we can build the application

angular.module('myApp', ['io.service']).

    run(function (io) {
        io.init({
            ioServer: 'http://localhost:3000',
            apiServer: 'http://localhost:8080/api',
            ioEvent: 'io.response'
        });
    }).

    controller('MainController', function ($scope, io) {
        $scope.$watch('question', function (newValue, oldValue) {
            if (newValue != oldValue) {
                io.emit({item: 'question', newValue: newValue, oldValue: oldValue});
            }
        });

        io.watch('answer', function (data) {
            $scope.answer = data.value;
            $scope.$apply();
        });
    });

And this’s the html

<!doctype html>
<html>

<head>
    <title>ws experiment</title>
</head>

<body ng-app="myApp">

<div ng-controller="MainController">

    <input type="text" ng-model="question">
    <hr>
    <h1>Hello {{answer}}!</h1>
</div>

<script src="assets/angular/angular.min.js"></script>
<script src="//localhost:3000/socket.io/socket.io.js"></script>

<script src="js/io.js"></script>
<script src="js/app.js"></script>

</body>
</html>

The idea of the application is to watch one model’s variable (‘question’ in this example) and each time it changes we will send the value to the websocket server and we’ll so something (we will convert the string to upper case in our example)

As you can read in one of my previous post I don’t like to send messages from the web browser to the websocket server directly (due do to authentication issues commented here). I prefer to use one server (a Silex server in this example)

include __DIR__ . '/../../vendor/autoload.php';

use Silex\Application;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;

$app = new Application(['debug' => true]);
$app->register(new G\Io\EmitterServiceProvider());

$app->get('/request', function (Application $app, Request $request) {

    $params = [
        'item'     => $request->get('item'),
        'newValue' => strtoupper($request->get('newValue')),
        'oldValue' => $request->get('oldValue'),
    ];

    try {
        $app['io.emit']($params);
        $params['status'] = true;
    } catch (\Exception $e) {
        $params['status'] = false;
    }

    return $app->json($params);
});

$app->run();

You can see the code within my github account.

Upgrading Cordova-Android apps outside Google Play Store with angularjs

Recent months I’ve working with enterprise mobile applications. This apps are’t distributed using any marketplace, so I need to handle the distributions process. With Android you can compile your apps, create your APK files and distribute them. You can send the files by email, use a download link, send the file with bluetooth, or whatever. With iOS is a bit different. You need to purchase one Enterprise license, compile the app and distribute your IPA files using Apple’s standards.

OK, but this post is not about how to distribute apps outside the markets. This post is about one big problem that appears when we need to upgrade our apps. How do the user knows that there’s a new version of the application and he needs to upgrade? When we work inside Google Play Store we don’t need to worry about it, but if we distribute our apps manually we need do something. We can send push notifications or email to the user to inform about the new version. Let me show you how I’m doing it.

My problem isn’t only to let know to the user about a new version. Sometimes I also need to ensure that the user runs the last version of the app. Imagine a critical bug (solved in the last release) but the user don’t upgrade.

First we need to create a static html page where the user can download the APK file. Imagine that this is the url where the user can download the last version of the app:


http://192.168.1.1:8888/app.apk

We can check the version of the app against the server each time the user opens the application, but this check means network communication and it’s slow. We need to reduce the communication between client and server to the smallest expression and only when it’s strictly necessary. Check the version each time can be good in a desktop application, but it reduces the user experience with mobile apps. My approach is slightly different. Normally we use token based authentication within mobile apps. That’s means we need to send our token with all request. If we send the token, we also can send the version.

In a angular app we can define the version and the path of our apk using a key-value store.

.value('config', {
        version: 4,
        androidAPK: "http://192.168.1.1:8888/app.apk"
    })

Now we need to add version parameter to each request (we can easily create a custom http service to append this parameter to each request automatically, indeed)

$http.get('http://192.168.1.1:8888/api/doSomething', {params: {_version: config.version}})
    .success(function (data) {
        alert("OK");
    })
    .error(function (err, status) {
        switch (status) {
            case 410:
                $state.go('upgrade');
                break;
        }
    });

We can create a simple backend to take care of the version and throws an HTTP exception (one 410 HTTP error for example) if versions doesn’t match. Here you can see a simple Silex example:

<?php

include __DIR__ . "/../vendor/autoload.php";

use Silex\Application;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Response;
use Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Exception\HttpException;

$app = new Application([
    'debug'   => true,
    'version' => 4,
]);

$app->after(function (Request $request, Response $response) {
    $response->headers->set('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', '*');
});

$app->get('/api/doSomething', function (Request $request, Application $app) {
    if ($request->get('_version') != $app['version']) {
        throw new HttpException(410, "Wrong version");
    } else {
        return $app->json('hello');
    }
});

$app->run();

As you can see we need to take care about CORS

With this simple example we can realize if user has a wrong version within each server request. If version don’t match we can, for example redirect to an specific route to inform that the user needs to upgrade the app and provide a link to perform the action.

With Android we cannot create a link to APK file. It doesn’t work. We need to download the APK (using FileTransfer plugin) and open the file using webintent plugin.

The code is very simple:

var fileTransfer = new FileTransfer();
fileTransfer.download(encodeURI(androidUrl), 
    "cdvfile://localhost/temporary/app.apk",
    function (entry) {
        window.plugins.webintent.startActivity({
            action: window.plugins.webintent.ACTION_VIEW,
            url: entry.toURL(),
            type: 'application/vnd.android.package-archive'
        }, function () {
        }, function () {
            alert('Failed to open URL via Android Intent.');
            console.log("Failed to open URL via Android Intent. URL: " + entry.fullPath);
        });
    }, function (error) {
        console.log("download error source " + error.source);
        console.log("download error target " + error.target);
        console.log("upload error code" + error.code);
    }, true);

And basically that’s all. When user self-upgrade the app it closes automatically and he needs to open it again, but now with the correct version.

Talk about SOLID and Symfony at the deSymfony 2014 conference.

Last saturday I attended to the deSymfony conference in Barcelona. A great opportunity to meet again with the PHP and Symfony community in Spain. This year the conference accepted my talk about SOLID and Symfony. Here you can see the slides of the talk (slides in spanish):

The conference was perfect. Barcelona is an incredible city and the conference place (10 minutes walking from the Sagrada Familia), was incredible too. Great talks. But the best, as always, the coffe breaks with the conversations with the Symfony and PHP community from Valencia, Zaragoza, Madrid, Barcelona, …

That’s me in action speaking about SOLID principles and Symfony:
Bo90AasCMAAdHL8 (photo source)

But the best of my speech was in the opposite direction. Many thanks to all of you :)

20140531_152345

Token based authentication with Silex Applications

Imagine this simple Silex application:

use Silex\Application;

$app = new Application();

$app->get('/api/info', function (Application $app) {
    return $app->json([
        'status' => true,
        'info'   => [
            'name'    => 'Gonzalo',
            'surname' => 'Ayuso'
        ]]);
});

$app->run();

What happens if we want to use a security layer? We can use sessions. Sessions are the “standard” way to perform authentication in web applications, but when our application is a PhoneGap/Cordova application that uses a Silex server as API server, sessions aren’t the best way. The best way now is a token based authentication. The idea is simple. First we need a valid token. Our API server will give us a valid token if we send valid credentials in a login form. Then we need to send the token with each request (the same way than we send the session cookie with each request).

With Silex we can check this token and validate.

use Silex\Application;

$app = new Application();

$app->get('/api/info', function (Application $app) {
    $token = $app->get('_token');
    
    // here we need to validate the token ...

    return $app->json([
        'status' => true,
        'info'   => [
            'name'    => 'Gonzalo',
            'surname' => 'Ayuso'
        ]]);
});

$app->run();

It isn’t an elegant solution. We need to validate the token within all routes and that’s bored. We also can use middlewares and validates the token with $app->before(). We’re going to build something like this, but with a few variations. First I want to keep the main application as clean as possible. Validation logic must be separated from application logic, so we will extend Silex\Application. Our main application will be like this:

use G\Silex\Application;

$app = new Application();

$app->get('/api/info', function (Application $app) {
    return $app->json([
        'status' => true,
        'info'   => [
            'name'    => 'Gonzalo',
            'surname' => 'Ayuso'
        ]]);
});

$app->run();

Instead of Silex\Application we’ll use G\Silex\Application.

namespace G\Silex;

use Silex\Application as SilexApplication;
use G\Silex\Provider\Login\LoginBuilder;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Response;

class Application extends SilexApplication
{
    public function __construct(array $values = [])
    {
        parent::__construct($values);

        LoginBuilder::mountProviderIntoApplication('/auth', $this);

        $this->after(function (Request $request, Response $response) {
            $response->headers->set('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', '*');
        });
    }
}

Our new G\Silex\Application is a Silex\Application enabling CORS. We also mount a Service provider.

The responsibility of our API server will be check the token of every request and to provide one way to get a new token. To get a new token we will create a route “/auth/validateCredentials”. If a valid credentials are given, new token will be send to client.

Our Service provider has two parts: a service provider and a controller provider.

To mount both providers we will use a LoginBuilder class:

namespace G\Silex\Provider\Login;

use Silex\Application;

class LoginBuilder
{
    public static function mountProviderIntoApplication($route, Application $app)
    {
        $app->register(new LoginServiceProvider());
        $app->mount($route, (new LoginControllerProvider())->setBaseRoute($route));
    }
}

Our Controller provider:

namespace G\Silex\Provider\Login;

use Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Exception\AccessDeniedHttpException;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;
use Silex\ControllerProviderInterface;
use Silex\Application;

class LoginControllerProvider implements ControllerProviderInterface
{
    const VALIDATE_CREDENTIALS = '/validateCredentials';
    const TOKEN_HEADER_KEY     = 'X-Token';
    const TOKEN_REQUEST_KEY    = '_token';

    private $baseRoute;

    public function setBaseRoute($baseRoute)
    {
        $this->baseRoute = $baseRoute;

        return $this;
    }

    public function connect(Application $app)
    {
        $this->setUpMiddlewares($app);

        return $this->extractControllers($app);
    }

    private function extractControllers(Application $app)
    {
        $controllers = $app['controllers_factory'];

        $controllers->get(self::VALIDATE_CREDENTIALS, function (Request $request) use ($app) {
            $user   = $request->get('user');
            $pass   = $request->get('pass');
            $status = $app[LoginServiceProvider::AUTH_VALIDATE_CREDENTIALS]($user, $pass);

            return $app->json([
                'status' => $status,
                'info'   => $status ? ['token' => $app[LoginServiceProvider::AUTH_NEW_TOKEN]($user)] : []
            ]);
        });

        return $controllers;
    }

    private function setUpMiddlewares(Application $app)
    {
        $app->before(function (Request $request) use ($app) {
            if (!$this->isAuthRequiredForPath($request->getPathInfo())) {
                if (!$this->isValidTokenForApplication($app, $this->getTokenFromRequest($request))) {
                    throw new AccessDeniedHttpException('Access Denied');
                }
            }
        });
    }

    private function getTokenFromRequest(Request $request)
    {
        return $request->headers->get(self::TOKEN_HEADER_KEY, $request->get(self::TOKEN_REQUEST_KEY));
    }

    private function isAuthRequiredForPath($path)
    {
        return in_array($path, [$this->baseRoute . self::VALIDATE_CREDENTIALS]);
    }

    private function isValidTokenForApplication(Application $app, $token)
    {
        return $app[LoginServiceProvider::AUTH_VALIDATE_TOKEN]($token);
    }
}

And our Service provider:

namespace G\Silex\Provider\Login;

use Silex\Application;
use Silex\ServiceProviderInterface;

class LoginServiceProvider implements ServiceProviderInterface
{
    const AUTH_VALIDATE_CREDENTIALS = 'auth.validate.credentials';
    const AUTH_VALIDATE_TOKEN       = 'auth.validate.token';
    const AUTH_NEW_TOKEN            = 'auth.new.token';

    public function register(Application $app)
    {
        $app[self::AUTH_VALIDATE_CREDENTIALS] = $app->protect(function ($user, $pass) {
            return $this->validateCredentials($user, $pass);
        });

        $app[self::AUTH_VALIDATE_TOKEN] = $app->protect(function ($token) {
            return $this->validateToken($token);
        });

        $app[self::AUTH_NEW_TOKEN] = $app->protect(function ($user) {
            return $this->getNewTokenForUser($user);
        });
    }

    public function boot(Application $app)
    {
    }

    private function validateCredentials($user, $pass)
    {
        return $user == $pass;
    }

    private function validateToken($token)
    {
        return $token == 'a';
    }

    private function getNewTokenForUser($user)
    {
        return 'a';
    }
}

Our Service provider will have the logic to validate credentials, token and it must be able to generate a new token:

    private function validateCredentials($user, $pass)
    {
        return $user == $pass;
    }

    private function validateToken($token)
    {
        return $token == 'a';
    }

    private function getNewTokenForUser($user)
    {
        return 'a';
    }

As we can see the logic of the example is very simple. It’s just an example and here we must to perform our logic. Probably we need to check credentials with our database, and our token must be stored somewhere to be validated later.

You can see the example in my github account. In another post we will see how to build a client application with angularJs to use this API server.

Yet another Database Abstraction layer with PHP and DBAL

I’m not a big fan of ORMs. I feel very confortable working with raw SQLs and because of that I normally use DBAL (or PDO in old projects). I’ve got one small library to handle my dayly operations with databases and today I’ve written this library

First of all imagine one DBAL connection. I’m using a sqlite in-memomy database in this example but we can use any database supported by DBAL (aka “almost all”):

use Doctrine\DBAL\DriverManager;

$conn = DriverManager::getConnection([
    'driver' => 'pdo_sqlite',
    'memory' => true
]);

We can also create one DBAL connection from a PDO connection. It’s usefull to use DBAL within legacy applications instead of creating a new connection (remember that DBAL works over PDO)

use Doctrine\DBAL\DriverManager;

$conn = DriverManager::getConnection(['pdo' => new PDO('sqlite::memory:')]);

Now we set up the database for the example

$conn->exec("CREATE TABLE users (
            userid VARCHAR PRIMARY KEY  NOT NULL ,
            password VARCHAR NOT NULL ,
            name VARCHAR,
            surname VARCHAR
            );");
$conn->exec("INSERT INTO users VALUES('user','pass','Name','Surname');");
$conn->exec("INSERT INTO users VALUES('user2','pass2','Name2','Surname2');");

Our table “users” has two records. Now we can start to use our library.

First we create a new instance of our library:

use G\Db;

$db = new Db($conn);

Now a simple query from a string:

$data = $db->select("select * from users");

Sometimes I’m lazy and I don’t want to write the whole SQL string and I want to perform a select * from table:

use G\Sql;
$data = $db->select(SQL::createFromTable("users"));

Probably we need to filter our Select statement with a WHERE clause:

$data = $db->select(SQL::createFromTable("users", ['userid' => 'user2']));

And now something very intersting (at least for me). I want to iterate over the recordset and maybe change it. Of course I can use “foreach” over $data and do whatever I need, but I preffer to use the following sintax:

$data = $db->select(SQL::createFromTable("users"), function (&$row) {
    $row['name'] = strtoupper($row['name']);
});

For me it’s more readable. I iterate over the recordset and change the row ‘name’ to uppercase. Here you can see what is doing my “select” function:

/**
* @param Sql|string $sql
* @param \Closure $callback
* @return array
*/
public function select($sql, \Closure $callback = null)
{
    if ($sql instanceof Sql) {
        $sqlString = $sql->getString();
        $parameters = $sql->getParameters();
        $types = $sql->getTypes();
    } else {
        $sqlString = $sql;
        $parameters = [];
        $types = [];
    }

    $statement = $this->conn->executeQuery($sqlString, $parameters, $types);
    $data = $statement->fetchAll();
    if (!is_null($callback) && count($data) > 0) {
        $out = [];
        foreach ($data as $row) {
            if (call_user_func_array($callback, [&$row]) !== false) {
                $out[] = $row;
            }
        }
        $data = $out;
   }

   return $data;
}

And finally transactions (I normally never use autocommit and I like to handle transactions by my own)

$db->transactional(function (Db $db) {
    $userId = 'temporal';

    $db->insert('users', [
        'USERID'   => $userId,
        'PASSWORD' => uniqid(),
        'NAME'     => 'name3',
        'SURNAME'  => 'name3'
    ]);

    $db->update('users', ['NAME' => 'updatedName'], ['USERID' => $userId]);
    $db->delete('users', ['USERID' => $userId]);
});

The “transactional” function it’s very simmilar than DBAL’s transactional function

public function transactional(\Closure $callback)
{
    $out = null;
    $this->conn->beginTransaction();
    try {
        $out = $callback($this);
        $this->conn->commit();
    } catch (\Exception $e) {
        $this->conn->rollback();
        throw $e;
    }

    return $out;
}

I change a little bit because I like to return a value within the closure and allow to do things like that:

$status = $db->transactional(function (Db $db) {
    $userId = 'temporal';

    $db->insert('users', [
        'USERID'   => $userId,
        'PASSWORD' => uniqid(),
        'NAME'     => 'name3',
        'SURNAME'  => 'name3'
    ]);

    $db->update('users', ['NAME' => 'updatedName'], ['USERID' => $userId]);
    $db->delete('users', ['USERID' => $userId]);

    return "OK"
});

The other functions (insert, update, delete) only bypass the calls to DBAL’s funcitons:

private $conn;

public function __construct(Doctrine\DBAL\Connection $conn)
{
    $this->conn = $conn;
}

public function insert($tableName, array $values = [], array $types = [])
{
    $this->conn->insert($tableName, $values, $types);
}

public function delete($tableName, array $where = [], array $types = [])
{
    $this->conn->delete($tableName, $where, $types);
}

public function update($tableName, array $data, array $where = [], array $types = [])
{
    $this->conn->update($tableName, $data, $where, $types);
}

And that’s all. You can use the library with composer and download at github.

BTW I’ve test the new Sensiolabs product (SensioLabs Insight) to analyze the code and verify good practices and I’ve got the Platinum medal #yeah!

Auto injecting dependencies in PHP objects

I must admit I don’t really know what’s the correct title for this post. Finally I use “Auto injecting dependencies in PHP objects”. I know it isn’t very descriptive. Let me explain it a little bit. This time I want to automate the Hollywood Principle (“Don’t call us, we’ll call you”). The idea is simple. Imagine one “controller”

class Controller
{
    public function hi($name)
    {
        return "Hi $name";
    }
}

We can easily automate the “hi” action

$controller = new Controller();
echo $controller->hi("Gonzalo");

Or maybe if we are building a framework and our class name and action name depends on user-input:

$class = "Controller";
$action = "hi";
$arguments = ['name' => "Gonzalo"];

echo call_user_function_array([new $class, $action], arguments);

But imagine that we want to allow something like that:

class Controller
{
    public function hi($name, Request $request)
    {
        return "Hi $name " .$request->get('surname');
    }
}

Now we need to inject Request object within our action “hi”, but not always. Only when user set a input variable with the type “Request”. Imagine that we also want to allow this kind of injection in the constructor too. We can need to use Reflection to create our instance and to call our action. Sometimes I need to work with custom frameworks and legacy PHP applications. I’ve done it in a couple of projects, but now I want to create a library to automate this operation.

The idea is to use a Dependency Injection Container (Pimple in my example) and retrieve the dependency from container (if it’s available). I cannot use “new” keyword to create the instance and also I cannot call directly the action.

One usage example is:

class Foo
{
    public function hi($name)
    {
        return "Hi $name";
    }
}

class Another
{
    public function bye($name)
    {
        return "Bye $name";
    }
}

class Bar
{
    private $foo;

    public function __construct(Foo $foo, $surname = null)
    {
        $this->foo     = $foo;
        $this->surname = $surname;
    }

    public function hi(Another $another, $name)
    {
        return $this->foo->hi($name . " " . $this->surname) . ' ' . $another->bye($name);
    }
}

$container = new Pimple();
$container['name'] = "Gonzalo2";

$builder = new G\Builder($container);

$bar = $builder->create('Bar', ['surname' => 'Ayuso']);
var_dump($builder->call([$bar, 'hi']));

var_dump($bar->hi(new Another(), 'xxxxx'));

Our library tries to retrieve the dependecy from the DIC. If it cannot do it, it creates the a new instance.
The whole “magic” is in the Builder class. You can see the library in my github account.

Playing with HTML5. Building a simple pool of WebWokers

Today I’m playing with the HTML5’s WebWorkers. Since our JavaScript code runs within a single thread in our WebBrowser, heavy scripts can lock the execution of our code. HTML5 gives us one tool called WebWorkers to allow us to run different threads within our Application.

Today I’m playing with one small example (that’s just an experiment). I want to create a pool of WebWebworkers and use them as a simple queue.
The usage of the library is similar than the usage of WebWorkers. The following code shows how to start the pool with 10 instances of our worker “js/worker.js”

    // new worker pool with 10 instances of the worker
    var pool = new WorkerPool('js/worker.js', 10);

    // register callback to worker's onmessage event
    pool.registerOnMessage(function (e) {
        console.log("Received (from worker): ", e.data);
    });

“js/worker.js” is a standard WebWorker. In this example our worker perform XHR request to a API server (in this case one Silex application)

importScripts('ajax.js');

self.addEventListener('message', function (e) {
    var data = e.data;

    switch (data.method) {
        case 'GET':
            getRequest(data.resource, function(xhr) {
                self.postMessage({status: xhr.status, responseText: xhr.responseText});
            });
            break;
    }
}, false);

WebWorkers runs in different scope than a traditional browser application. Not all JavaScript objects are available in the webworker scpope. For example we cannot access to “window” and DOM elements, but we can use XMLHttpRequest. In our experimente we’re going to preform XHR requests from the webworker.

The library creates a queue with the variable number of workers:

var WorkerPool;

WorkerPool = (function () {
    var pool = {};
    var poolIds = [];

    function WorkerPool(worker, numberOfWorkers) {
        this.worker = worker;
        this.numberOfWorkers = numberOfWorkers;

        for (var i = 0; i < this.numberOfWorkers; i++) {
            poolIds.push(i);
            var myWorker = new Worker(worker);

            +function (i) {
                myWorker.addEventListener('message', function (e) {
                    var data = e.data;
                    console.log("Worker #" + i + " finished. status: " + data.status);
                    pool[i].status = true;
                    poolIds.push(i);
                });
            }(i);

            pool[i] = {status: true, worker: myWorker};
        }

        this.getFreeWorkerId = function (callback) {
            if (poolIds.length > 0) {
                return callback(poolIds.pop());
            } else {
                var that = this;
                setTimeout(function () {
                    that.getFreeWorkerId(callback);
                }, 100);
            }
        }
    }

    WorkerPool.prototype.postMessage = function (data) {
        this.getFreeWorkerId(function (workerId) {
            pool[workerId].status = false;
            var worker = pool[workerId].worker;
            console.log("postMessage with worker #" + workerId);
            worker.postMessage(data);
        });
    };

    WorkerPool.prototype.registerOnMessage = function (callback) {
        for (var i = 0; i < this.numberOfWorkers; i++) {
            pool[i].worker.addEventListener('message', callback);
        }
    };

    WorkerPool.prototype.getFreeIds = function () {
        return poolIds;
    };

    return WorkerPool;
})();

The API server is a simple Silex application. This application also enables cross origin (CORS). You can read about it here.

use Silex\Application;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Response;

$app = new Application();

$app->get('/hello', function () use ($app) {
    error_log("GET /hello");
    sleep(2); // emulate slow process
    return $app->json(['method' => 'GET', 'response' => 'OK']);
});

$app->after(function (Request $request, Response $response) {
    $response->headers->set('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', '*');
});

$app->run();

You can see the whole code in my github account.

Here one small screencast to see the application in action.

How to run a Web Server from a PHP application

Normally we deploy our PHP applications in a webserver (such as apache, nginx, …). I used to have one apache webserver in my personal computer to play with my applications, but from time to now I preffer to use PHP’s built-in webserver for my experiments. It’s really simple. Just run:

php -S 0.0.0.0:8080 

and we’ve got one PHP webserver at our current directory. With another languages (such as node.js, Python) we can start a Web Server from our application. For example with node.js:

var http = require('http');
http.createServer(function (req, res) {
  res.writeHead(200, {'Content-Type': 'text/plain'});
  res.end('Hello World\n');
}).listen(8080, '0.0.0.0');
console.log('Server running at http://0.0.0.0:8080');

With PHP we cannot do it. Sure? That assertion isn’t really true. We can do it. I’ve just create one small library to do it in two different ways. First running the built-in web server and also running one React web server.

I want to share the same interface to start the server. In this implementation we will register one callback to handle incomming requests. This callback will accept a Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request and it will return a Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Response. Then we will start our server listening to one port and we will run our callback per Request (a simple implementeation of the reactor pattern)

We will create a static factory to create the server

namespace G\HttpServer;
use React;

class Builder
{
    public static function createBuiltInServer($requestHandler)
    {
        $server = new BuiltInServer();
        $server->registerHandler($requestHandler);

        return $server;
    }

    public static function createReactServer($requestHandler)
    {
        $loop   = React\EventLoop\Factory::create();
        $socket = new React\Socket\Server($loop);

        $server = new ReactServer($loop, $socket);
        $server->registerHandler($requestHandler);

        return $server;
    }
}

Each server (BuiltIn, and React) has its own implementation.

And basically that’s all. We can run a simple webserver with the built-in server

use G\HttpServer\Builder;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;

Builder::createBuiltInServer(function (Request $request) {
        return "Hello " . $request->get('name');
    })->listen(1337);

Or the same thing but with React

use G\HttpServer\Builder;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;

Builder::createReactServer(function (Request $request) {
        return "Hello " . $request->get('name');
    })->listen(1337);

As you can see our callback handles one Request and returns one Response (The typical HttpKernel), because of that we also can run one Silex application:
With built-in:

use G\HttpServer\Builder;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;

$app = new Silex\Application();

$app->get('/', function () {
        return 'Hello';
    });

$app->get('/hello/{name}', function ($name) {
        return 'Hello ' . $name;
    });

Builder::createBuiltInServer(function (Request $request) use ($app) {
        return $app->handle($request);
    })->listen(1337);

And the same with React:

use G\HttpServer\Builder;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;

$app = new Silex\Application();

$app->get('/', function () {
        return 'Hello';
    });

$app->get('/hello/{name}', function ($name) {
        return 'Hello ' . $name;
    });

Builder::createReactServer(function (Request $request) use ($app) {
        return $app->handle($request);
    })->listen(1337);

As an exercise I also have created one small benchmark (with both implementations) with apache ab running 100 request with a 10 request at the same time. Here you can see the outcomes.

  builtin react
Simple response    
ab -n 100 -c 10 http://localhost:1337/
Time taken for tests 0.878 seconds 0.101 seconds
Requests per second (mean) 113.91 [#/sec] 989.33 [#/sec]
Time per request (mean) 87.791 [ms] 10.108 [ms]
Time per request (mean across all concurrent requests) 8.779 [ms] 1.011 [ms]
Transfer rate 21.02 [Kbytes/sec] 112.07 [Kbytes/sec]
Silex application
ab -n 100 -c 10 http://localhost:1337/
Time taken for tests 2.241 seconds 0.247 seconds
Requests per second (mean) 44.62 [#/sec] 405.29 [#/sec]
Time per request 224.119 [ms] 24.674 [ms]
Time per request (mean across all concurrent requests) 22.412 [ms] 2.467 [ms]
Transfer rate 10.89 [Kbytes/sec] 75.60 [Kbytes/sec]
ab -n 100 -c 10 http://localhost:1337/hello/gonzalo
Time taken for tests 2.183 seconds 0.271 seconds
Requests per second (mean) 45.81 [#/sec] (mean) 369.67 [#/sec]
Time per request (mean) 218.290 [ms] (mean) 27.051 [ms]
Time per request (mean across all concurrent requests) 21.829 [ms] 2.705 [ms]
Transfer rate 11.54 [Kbytes/sec] 71.84 [Kbytes/sec]

Built-in web server is not suitable for production environments, but React would be a useful tool in some cases (maybe not good for running Facebook but good enough for punctual situations).

Library is available at github and also you can use it with composer

Playing with event dispatcher and Silex. Sending logs to a remote server.

Today I continue playing with event dispatcher and Silex. Now I want to send a detailed log of our Kernel events to a remote server. We can do it something similar with Monolog, but I want to implement one working example hacking a little bit the event dispatcher. Basically we’re going to create one Logger class (implementing PSR-3 of course)

namespace G;

use Psr\Log\LoggerInterface;
use Psr\Log\LogLevel;

class Logger implements LoggerInterface
{
    private $socket;

    public function __construct($socket)
    {
        $this->socket = $socket;
    }

    function __destruct()
    {
        @fclose($this->socket);
    }

    public function emergency($message, array $context = array())
    {
        $this->sendLog($message, $context, LogLevel::EMERGENCY);
    }

    public function alert($message, array $context = array())
    {
        $this->sendLog($message, $context, LogLevel::ALERT);
    }

    public function critical($message, array $context = array())
    {
        $this->sendLog($message, $context, LogLevel::CRITICAL);
    }

    public function error($message, array $context = array())
    {
        $this->sendLog($message, $context, LogLevel::ERROR);
    }

    public function warning($message, array $context = array())
    {
        $this->sendLog($message, $context, LogLevel::WARNING);
    }

    public function notice($message, array $context = array())
    {
        $this->sendLog($message, $context, LogLevel::NOTICE);
    }

    public function info($message, array $context = array())
    {
        $this->sendLog($message, $context, LogLevel::INFO);
    }

    public function debug($message, array $context = array())
    {
        $this->sendLog($message, $context, LogLevel::DEBUG);
    }

    public function log($level, $message, array $context = array())
    {
        $this->sendLog($message, $context, $level);
    }

    private function sendLog($message, array $context = array(), $level = LogLevel::INFO)
    {
        $data = serialize([$message, $context, $level]);
        @fwrite($this->socket, "{$data}\n");
    }
}

As you can see our Logger class send logs to a remote server, with a socket passed within the constructor.
We also need one Service Provider called LoggerServiceProvider to integrate our Logger instance into our Silex application.

namespace G;

use Silex\Application;
use Silex\ServiceProviderInterface;

class LoggerServiceProvider implements ServiceProviderInterface
{
    private $socket;

    public function __construct($socket)
    {
        $this->socket = $socket;
    }

    public function register(Application $app)
    {
        $app['remoteLogger'] = $app->share(
            function () use ($app) {
                return new Logger($this->socket);
            }
        );
    }

    public function boot(Application $app)
    {
    }
}

And now the last part is our Silex application:

use G\LoggerServiceProvider;
use G\Silex\Application;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;
use Symfony\Component\HttpKernel;
use Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Event;

$app = new Application();
$app->register(new LoggerServiceProvider(stream_socket_client('tcp://localhost:4000')));

$app->on(HttpKernel\KernelEvents::REQUEST, function (Event\GetResponseEvent $event) use ($app) {
        $app->getLogger()->info($event->getName());
    }
);

$app->on(HttpKernel\KernelEvents::CONTROLLER, function (Event\FilterControllerEvent $event) use ($app) {
        $app->getLogger()->info($event->getName());
    }
);

$app->on(HttpKernel\KernelEvents::TERMINATE, function (Event\PostResponseEvent $event) use ($app) {
        $app->getLogger()->info($event->getName());
    }
);

$app->on(HttpKernel\KernelEvents::EXCEPTION, function (Event\GetResponseForExceptionEvent $event) use ($app) {
        $app->getLogger()->critical($event->getException()->getMessage());
    }
);

$app->get('/', function () {
    return 'Hello';
});

$app->run();

As we can see the event dispacher send each event to a remote server (in this example: tcp://localhost:4000). Now we only need a tcp server to handle those sockets. We can use different tools and libraries to do that. In this example we’re going to use React.

use React\EventLoop\Factory;
use React\Socket\Server;

$loop   = Factory::create();
$socket = new Server($loop);

$socket->on('connection', function (\React\Socket\Connection $conn){
    $unique = uniqid();
    $conn->on('data', function ($data) use ($unique) {
            list($message, $context, $level) = \unserialize($data);
            echo date("d/m/Y H:i:s")."::{$level}::{$unique}::{$message}" . PHP_EOL;
        });
});

echo "Socket server listening on port 4000." .PHP_EOL;
echo "You can connect to it by running: telnet localhost 4000" . PHP_EOL;

$socket->listen(4000);
$loop->run();

Now we only need to start our servers:
our silex one

php -S 0.0.0.0:8080 -t www

and the tcp server

php app/server.php

One screencast showing the prototype in action:

You can see the full code in my github account.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 978 other followers